tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post6382670033492777976..comments2024-03-14T07:32:30.141+09:00Comments on Marketing Japan: September 11 and the Nazification of Amerikamike in tokyo rogershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04977446676243085409noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-23376511860985393942012-01-23T17:21:41.188+09:002012-01-23T17:21:41.188+09:00Thanks for writing this. As sad as what you wrote ...Thanks for writing this. As sad as what you wrote it is the truth and I'm glad someone has the same morbid thought for the swastika spangle banner but its the honest irony of how our country is today. Waving it and plastering it anywhere to show some false patriotism for destroying the third world while we become a third world.Kyle Gnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-83999884028120438952011-09-13T12:05:45.088+09:002011-09-13T12:05:45.088+09:00You're wrong. From wiki: "Paul calls him...You're wrong. From wiki: "Paul calls himself "strongly pro-life"[203] and "an unshakable foe of abortion."[204] However, he believes regulation of medical decisions about maternal or fetal health is "best handled at the state level.""<br /><br />Translation : States like Texas will be able to outlaw abortion if he were president. He's against it. If it's not in the constitution, ie abortion, Paul is against it. His voting record speaks for itself.<br /><br />Also from wiki: "Paul has said that the ninth and tenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution do not grant the federal government any authority to legalize or ban abortion, stating that "the federal government has no authority whatsoever to involve itself in the abortion issue."[210] However, this has not stopped Paul from voting in favor of a federal ban on partial-birth abortion in 2000[211] and 2003.[212]<br /><br />Paul introduced the Sanctity of Life Act of 2005, a bill that would have defined human life to begin at conception, and removed challenges to prohibitions on abortion from federal court jurisdiction."Marknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-2025689923878238292011-09-13T09:38:14.407+09:002011-09-13T09:38:14.407+09:00No Mark,
Ron Paul doesn't want to abolish abor...No Mark,<br />Ron Paul doesn't want to abolish abortions. Ron Paul's position is that abortion is none of the government's business. There should be no federal laws legalizing or outlawing abortion. This is a personal issue. Nowhere in the US constitution does it state that the federal government has the authority to legalize or outlaw medical procedures.<br /><br />That is his official position. Please do not pass disinformation.mike in tokyo rogershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04977446676243085409noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-10303218397384542922011-09-13T07:31:08.631+09:002011-09-13T07:31:08.631+09:00Ah yes, Ron Paul. If you want to abolish abortion...Ah yes, Ron Paul. If you want to abolish abortions, yay Ron Paul. He has some good points, but everyone seems to gloss over all the bad ones when it comes to him. I'll still vote for him as usual, but it's more about saying we need another party than even considering he might win.<br /><br />The Daily Show did a good bit on how all of the MSM showed graphs and mentioned all of the candidates except Paul, no matter how high he was polling.Marknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-67389917315343530962011-09-12T23:35:20.519+09:002011-09-12T23:35:20.519+09:00Mike, I'm so glad to hear you talking about Ro...Mike, I'm so glad to hear you talking about Ron Paul as well. The sad thing is that despite leading in nearly every poll in the past few months, almost nobody hears about him. The media and establishment want to keep him out of the spotlight as much as possible!Jimbohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09289473216304069018noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-20424270305230305122011-09-11T17:47:58.410+09:002011-09-11T17:47:58.410+09:00PS: Thanks Anon... BUt I believe it should be &quo...PS: Thanks Anon... BUt I believe it should be "Ron Paul in 2012!" No?mike in tokyo rogershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04977446676243085409noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-24392887799477756022011-09-11T17:47:13.411+09:002011-09-11T17:47:13.411+09:00Hi Kevin,
I hate to agree with you. Ask me now why...Hi Kevin,<br />I hate to agree with you. Ask me now why I often write about how that place is past redemption. Got gold?mike in tokyo rogershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04977446676243085409noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-22860053702832203862011-09-11T17:37:57.183+09:002011-09-11T17:37:57.183+09:00If you read the chapter, "The Imperative of C...If you read the chapter, "The Imperative of Class" in the book, The Unheavenly City, it accurately describes the different classes and why they vote for candidates who promise something for nothing. (So does the book, Democracy: The God That Failed.)<br /><br />PDF: http://www.kevinrkosar.com/Edward-C-Banfield/Edward-C-Banfield-The-Unheavenly-City-Revisited.pdf <br /><br />LRC Link: http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/92789.html<br /><br />If people voted for sensible candidates, there would be no FDR, Putin, George W., Al Gore, Obama, etc.diego.ahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12400541545619526022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-19432166591207047142011-09-11T17:21:33.885+09:002011-09-11T17:21:33.885+09:00I'm afraid that Ron Paul doesn't stand a c...I'm afraid that Ron Paul doesn't stand a chance to become president of the US. Reason? He's far too sensible.Kevin Rileyhttp://kevinrileypublishing.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-12596169181473383282011-09-11T17:13:31.474+09:002011-09-11T17:13:31.474+09:00RON PAUL IN 2011!RON PAUL IN 2011!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com