tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post2694649130723712813..comments2024-03-14T07:32:30.141+09:00Comments on Marketing Japan: Is Fukushima the biggest industrial catastrophe in the history of mankind? A Comparisonmike in tokyo rogershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04977446676243085409noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-4551846325965578222011-07-10T11:55:34.949+09:002011-07-10T11:55:34.949+09:00Anonymous, try to read and comprehend.
Long term ...Anonymous, try to read and comprehend. <br />Long term incidents are well documented in this article. Chernobyl is specifically written about in the article and there and other links to much more. Your analogy is completely false. <br /><br />So, then, let's a make a logical and consistent analogy, shall we? How about Chernobyl? This came out on the 25th anniversary of that event: "Chernobyl was by far the world’s worst nuclear accident. However, official studies suggest that the accident was not as apocalyptic as we have often been led to believe over the past 24 years. According to a report in 2005, produced by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), "4,000 people could eventually die of radiation exposure from the Chernobyl nuclear power plant…" <br /><br />As of mid-2005, however, fewer than 50 deaths had been directly attributed to radiation from the disaster, almost all being highly exposed rescue workers, many who died within months of the accident but others who died as late as 2004.’" <br /><br />Here's the link: http://modernmarketingjapan.blogspot.com/2011/04/24th-anniversary-of-chernobyl-some.html<br /><br />Also, coal and oil industry kill 5,000 times more people than radiation has (and that includes Hiroshima and nagasaki) these are processes and industries that have been going on for over a cntury but we don't hear a peep out of people like you about those. http://bit.ly/hAeJuK<br /><br />Your analogy is completely and totally wrong. It's good that you will comment and post an argument but at least try to have a functioning, logical one.mike in tokyo rogershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04977446676243085409noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-15012733022124171642011-07-09T19:57:35.251+09:002011-07-09T19:57:35.251+09:00Your comparison is like getting a million people t...Your comparison is like getting a million people to smoke a ciggarette and then saying no one got sick. <br />get them smoking 10 years and things will be a lot different when teh effects have had time to take hold. <br /><br />Same with this. <br />Lets see if you stand by this ridicilous comment in 10-15 years time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2207076947655236975.post-58696740362800340182011-07-09T10:23:24.445+09:002011-07-09T10:23:24.445+09:00Thank you for the perspective, Mike.Thank you for the perspective, Mike.Brian G. Heyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05646951149617990867noreply@blogger.com