Thursday, July 12, 2012

Japan Murders Baby Pandas!? What Does That Have to Do With Disputed Terrirtories? 80% of Chinese Believe the Story to be True!



This is a weird one. You've heard about the giant panda baby that died at Ueno zoo? The zoo authorities say the panda died of pneumonia.


In China, though, people are mightily angry about this.


This is a prime example of how some people will use seemingly innocuous events to further nationalist ideals. 


One might ask how a baby panda death could be used to stoke nationalist flames and anti-Japanese sentiment in China?


Here it is.


Yesterday, on the Internet in China, it has been reported that over 80% of respondents believe that the (expletive deleted) Japanese intentionally murdered the baby panda and this has to do with the Tokyo government intending to buy a chain of islands whose ownership is disputed by both nations


Seems a far stretch but here is how the rumor is going in China according to Sankei Newspapers.


China is steaming about the Tokyo government attempting to buy the disputed island chain known in Japan as Senkaku (In China, they are called Daioyu)... 


Whenever a baby panda is born in a Japanese zoo, the government's of both Japan and China have agreed that the Japanese can pick names but those names must have final approval of Chinese authorities.


According to rumor, Tokyo mayor Shintaro Ishihara, (the man instigating the islands buy) has suggested the name of "Sen Sen" for the panda. According to this rumor, this name comes from, you guessed it, the first kanji in Senkaku Islands (尖閣諸島). This would be "尖." (Sen Sen).


Even though the name wasn't submitted to the Chinese and Ishihara has zero right to even decide a name, this story was leaked...Once the name was leaked, it became a political problem so, instead of dealing with that, the Japanese intentionally murdered the baby panda because of it.


Like I said, this story is a bit of a stretch.


Now, this story is spreading in China and stoking fierce anti-Japanese sentiment. 


In a nation that blocks much of the countries outside Internet access and a survey like this takes off like wildfire with over 80% of respondents agreeing that the Japanese intentionally murdered a baby animal because of a name rejection, one must again ask "Cui Bono?".... Who benefits?


Here is the original article in Japanese as I have a suspicion that this story will disappear soon:

赤ちゃんパンダ死ぬ 中国のネット「殺したんだろう」悪意満ちた書き込み

【北京=川越一】上野動物園のジャイアントパンダの赤ちゃんが死んだことについて、中国のインターネット上には11日、故意の殺害を疑うなど悪意に満ちた書き込みがあふれた。
ネット上には「小日本(日本人の蔑称)が殺したんだろう!」といった書き込みが目立っている。中国のサイトにはニュースの感想を問う簡易アンケートがあるが、回答者の8割以上が「憤怒」を選択した。
尖閣諸島(中国名・釣魚島)の購入計画を進める東京都の石原慎太郎知事が、赤ちゃんパンダの名前について、「尖尖」「閣閣」と語ったことで、中国国民の間ではパンダと領土問題が同時に論じられている。
「日本の不正な政治手段が国の宝にも波及した。全く手段を選ばない」など、政治的判断で殺害したとの“暴論”に発展。「小日本を殺せ」という報復論にまでエスカレートしている。

1 comment:

Jimbo said...

I've also heard that the Chinese government has an army of internet commenters on its payroll called the 50 cent party because they get paid 50 cents for every "comment" in favor of anything Chinese government and against anything else online. This is useful in flooding the internet with statist rhetoric to make people think it's what everyone over there believes.

Now, I don't doubt that 80% believe the panda story is true, but it's not really their fault when they're being lied to constantly.

It is pretty ridiculous though. They should just go all the way and say the Prime Minister (whoever it is this week) turned little Sensen into panda sushi while visiting Yasukuni Shrine.